Title |
Caddisflies (Insecta: Trichoptera) from the Middle Miocene of the Stavropol Region, Russia
|
---|---|
Published in |
Paleontological Journal, February 2019
|
DOI | 10.1134/s0031030118130142 |
Authors |
I. D. Sukatsheva, V. D. Ivanov, S. I. Melnitsky, D. S. Aristov |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 25% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 25% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 25% |
Student > Master | 1 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 50% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2019.
All research outputs
#7,336,528
of 23,128,387 outputs
Outputs from Paleontological Journal
#124
of 865 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#158,006
of 447,836 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Paleontological Journal
#7
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,128,387 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 865 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,836 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.