You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Copper(II) template synthesis of a new N2S2-donor macrocycle incorporating a pendent pyridyl substituent
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Inclusion Phenomena and Macrocyclic Chemistry, November 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10847-010-9886-1 |
| Authors |
Cindy Mora, Young Hoon Lee, Jack K. Clegg, Leonard F. Lindoy, Hong In Lee, Woo Taik Lim, Yang Kim |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor | 2 | 50% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 2 | 50% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2012.
All research outputs
#22,758,309
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Inclusion Phenomena and Macrocyclic Chemistry
#263
of 278 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#178,700
of 188,326 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Inclusion Phenomena and Macrocyclic Chemistry
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 278 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,326 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.