You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Try, try again: Lessons learned from success and failure in participatory modeling
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1525/elementa.347 |
| Authors |
Eleanor J. Sterling, Moira Zellner, Karen E. Jenni, Kirsten Leong, Pierre D. Glynn, Todd K. BenDor, Pierre Bommel, Klaus Hubacek, Antonie J. Jetter, Rebecca Jordan, Laura Schmitt Olabisi, Michael Paolisso, Steven Gray |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 33% |
| Australia | 2 | 8% |
| Portugal | 2 | 8% |
| Kenya | 1 | 4% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 4% |
| Sweden | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 9 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 54% |
| Scientists | 9 | 38% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 121 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 21% |
| Researcher | 25 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 8% |
| Other | 6 | 5% |
| Professor | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 19 | 16% |
| Unknown | 29 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 29 | 24% |
| Social Sciences | 15 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 8% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Engineering | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 20 | 17% |
| Unknown | 37 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2019.
All research outputs
#2,400,300
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene
#151
of 747 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,717
of 458,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene
#4
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 747 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 458,043 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.