| Title |
Uterine-preserving surgeries for the repair of pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review with meta-analysis and clinical practice guidelines
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Urogynecology Journal & Pelvic Floor Dysfunction, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00192-019-03876-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kate V. Meriwether, Ethan M. Balk, Danielle D. Antosh, Cedric K. Olivera, Shunaha Kim-Fine, Miles Murphy, Cara L. Grimes, Ambereen Sleemi, Ruchira Singh, Alexis A. Dieter, Catrina C. Crisp, David D. Rahn |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 13% |
| Greece | 1 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 5 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 3 | 38% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 25% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 82 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 13 | 16% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 6% |
| Researcher | 5 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 15% |
| Unknown | 37 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 30% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 2% |
| Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 41 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2022.
All research outputs
#6,868,728
of 25,703,943 outputs
Outputs from International Urogynecology Journal & Pelvic Floor Dysfunction
#608
of 2,917 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#137,833
of 458,409 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Urogynecology Journal & Pelvic Floor Dysfunction
#12
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,703,943 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,917 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 458,409 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.