↓ Skip to main content

Was it autoethnography? The classificatory, confessional and mad politics of lived experience in sociological research

Overview of attention for article published in Social Theory & Health, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#39 of 297)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
19 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
Title
Was it autoethnography? The classificatory, confessional and mad politics of lived experience in sociological research
Published in
Social Theory & Health, February 2019
DOI 10.1057/s41285-019-00090-4
Authors

Brigit McWade

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 19%
Student > Master 6 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 11%
Researcher 3 8%
Other 1 3%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 11 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 12 33%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 6%
Engineering 2 6%
Psychology 2 6%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 14 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 December 2020.
All research outputs
#1,583,024
of 25,000,733 outputs
Outputs from Social Theory & Health
#39
of 297 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,769
of 458,913 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Social Theory & Health
#3
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,000,733 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 297 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 458,913 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.