↓ Skip to main content

Fast-Track-Strategien in der Hüftendoprothetik

Overview of attention for article published in Die Orthopädie, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
Title
Fast-Track-Strategien in der Hüftendoprothetik
Published in
Die Orthopädie, February 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00132-019-03697-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

U. Nöth, T. Geiser, T. Kranich, E. von Rottkay, J. C. Reichert, M. Reyle-Hahn, L. Rackwitz

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 3 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 19%
Student > Bachelor 2 13%
Librarian 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 4 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 5 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 31%
Neuroscience 1 6%
Unknown 5 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2019.
All research outputs
#22,767,715
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Die Orthopädie
#276
of 678 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#395,607
of 457,901 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Die Orthopädie
#5
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 678 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 457,901 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.