↓ Skip to main content

Seeking Formula for Misinformation Treatment in Public Health Crises: The Effects of Corrective Information Type and Source

Overview of attention for article published in Health Communication, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
21 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
225 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
349 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Seeking Formula for Misinformation Treatment in Public Health Crises: The Effects of Corrective Information Type and Source
Published in
Health Communication, February 2019
DOI 10.1080/10410236.2019.1573295
Pubmed ID
Authors

Toni G. L. A. van der Meer, Yan Jin

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 349 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 349 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 52 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 11%
Student > Bachelor 29 8%
Researcher 26 7%
Lecturer 14 4%
Other 52 15%
Unknown 136 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 91 26%
Psychology 21 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 5%
Computer Science 12 3%
Arts and Humanities 12 3%
Other 49 14%
Unknown 145 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2020.
All research outputs
#2,786,545
of 25,703,943 outputs
Outputs from Health Communication
#261
of 1,819 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,050
of 460,592 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Communication
#7
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,703,943 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,819 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 460,592 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.