Title |
Atypical parkinsonism with severely reduced striatal dopamine uptake associated with a 16p11.2 duplication syndrome
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Neurology, January 2019
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00415-019-09182-7 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Benjamin Roeben, Dominik Blum, Heinz Gabriel, Matthis Synofzik |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 16 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 31% |
Researcher | 3 | 19% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 13% |
Student > Master | 1 | 6% |
Other | 1 | 6% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 4 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Neuroscience | 6 | 38% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 19% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 13% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 4 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2019.
All research outputs
#4,250,027
of 23,128,387 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurology
#1,019
of 4,537 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,262
of 437,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurology
#22
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,128,387 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,537 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,034 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.