You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Perioperative Quality Initiative consensus statement on the physiology of arterial blood pressure control in perioperative medicine
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BJA: The British Journal of Anaesthesia, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.bja.2019.01.011 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gareth L. Ackland, Charles S. Brudney, Maurizio Cecconi, Can Ince, Michael G. Irwin, Jonathan Lacey, Michael R. Pinsky, Michael PW. Grocott, Monty G. Mythen, Mark R. Edwards, Timothy E. Miller, Perioperative Quality Initiative-3 workgroup, POQI chairs, Michael PW. Grocott, Mark R. Edwards, Physiology group, Gareth L. Ackland, Charles S. Brudney, Maurizio Cecconi, Can Ince, Michael G. Irwin, Michael R. Pinsky, Preoperative blood pressure group, Robert Sanders, Finton Hughes, Angela Bader, Annemarie Thompson, Andreas Hoeft, David Williams, Andrew D. Shaw, Intraoperative blood pressure group, Daniel I. Sessler, Sol Aronson, Colin Berry, Tong J. Gan, John Kellum, James Plumb, Joshua Bloomstone, Postoperative blood pressure group, Matthew D. McEvoy, Julie K.M. Thacker, Ruchir Gupta, Elena Koepke, Aarne Feldheiser, Denny Levett, Frederic Michard, Mark Hamilton |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 162 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 37 | 23% |
| United States | 12 | 7% |
| Mexico | 10 | 6% |
| Canada | 6 | 4% |
| Spain | 5 | 3% |
| Australia | 4 | 2% |
| France | 3 | 2% |
| Colombia | 3 | 2% |
| Chile | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 24 | 15% |
| Unknown | 55 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 112 | 69% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 26 | 16% |
| Scientists | 19 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 151 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 151 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 17 | 11% |
| Researcher | 13 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 7% |
| Other | 40 | 26% |
| Unknown | 46 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 66 | 44% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 5% |
| Engineering | 7 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 13 | 9% |
| Unknown | 48 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 103. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2020.
All research outputs
#416,673
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from BJA: The British Journal of Anaesthesia
#73
of 6,758 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,930
of 460,722 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BJA: The British Journal of Anaesthesia
#3
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,758 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 460,722 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.