| Title |
Is Breast-Conserving Therapy Appropriate for Male Breast Cancer Patients? A National Cancer Database Analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Surgical Oncology, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1245/s10434-019-07159-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sarah B. Bateni, Anders J. Davidson, Mili Arora, Megan E. Daly, Susan L. Stewart, Richard J. Bold, Robert J. Canter, Candice A. M. Sauder |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 14 | 56% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Germany | 1 | 4% |
| Brazil | 1 | 4% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 7 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 64% |
| Scientists | 6 | 24% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 12% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 34 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 4 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 17 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 32% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 20 | 59% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2019.
All research outputs
#2,503,666
of 25,083,571 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#599
of 7,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,391
of 459,522 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#24
of 128 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,083,571 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,162 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 459,522 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 128 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.