↓ Skip to main content

“My Parents Decide If I Can. I Decide if I Want to.” Children's Views on Participation in Medical Research

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
“My Parents Decide If I Can. I Decide if I Want to.” Children's Views on Participation in Medical Research
Published in
Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, December 2011
DOI 10.1525/jer.2011.6.4.68
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ulrica Swartling, Mats G. Hansson, Johnny Ludvigsson, Anders Nordgren

Abstract

The participation of children in medical research raises many ethical issues, in particular regarding assent. However, little is known about children's own views on participation. This study presents results from interviews with children 10-12 years old with and without experience in a large-scale longitudinal screening study. We identified five themes: (1) knowledge about research, (2) a sense of altruism, (3) shared decision-making and right to dissent, (4) notions of integrity, privacy, and access, and (5) understanding of disease risk and personal responsibilities. We conclude that the children feel positive towards medical research, and want to take an active part in decisions and have their integrity respected. However, the study also indicates that children who had participated in longitudinal screening had a limited understanding, suggesting the vital importance of providing information appropriate to their age and maturity. This information should be provided out of respect for the children as persons, but also to promote their willingness to continue participating in longitudinal studies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 43 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 20%
Student > Bachelor 6 14%
Researcher 6 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Other 3 7%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 12 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 25%
Social Sciences 5 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 9%
Psychology 3 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 14 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2012.
All research outputs
#15,241,259
of 22,661,413 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics
#284
of 408 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#162,554
of 240,219 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,661,413 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 408 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,219 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.