↓ Skip to main content

Dissociations among memory measures in memory-impaired subjects: Evidence for a processing account of memory

Overview of attention for article published in Memory & Cognition, September 1992
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
108 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
Title
Dissociations among memory measures in memory-impaired subjects: Evidence for a processing account of memory
Published in
Memory & Cognition, September 1992
DOI 10.3758/bf03199587
Pubmed ID
Authors

Teresa A. Blaxton

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 3%
Philippines 1 3%
Unknown 32 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 24%
Researcher 6 18%
Professor 4 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 6%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 6 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 18 53%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 6%
Unspecified 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 7 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2019.
All research outputs
#7,584,555
of 23,128,387 outputs
Outputs from Memory & Cognition
#494
of 1,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,276
of 18,812 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Memory & Cognition
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,128,387 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,566 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 18,812 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them