You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Hydroclimatic Extremes as Challenges for the Water Management Community: Lessons from Oroville Dam and Hurricane Harvey Hydroclimatic Extremes as Challenges for the Water Management Community: Lessons from Oroville Dam and Hurricane Harvey
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1175/bams-d-18-0219.1 |
| Authors |
Julie A. Vano, Kathleen Miller, Michael D. Dettinger, Rob Cifelli, David Curtis, Alexis Dufour, J. Rolf Olsen, Anna M. Wilson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 39 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 26% |
| Researcher | 6 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 13% |
| Unknown | 10 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 8 | 21% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 10% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 15 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2020.
All research outputs
#7,070,412
of 23,128,387 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
#1,613
of 3,051 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#146,257
of 438,295 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
#31
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,128,387 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,051 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.3. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,295 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.