↓ Skip to main content

Characterising and correcting batch variation in an automated direct infusion mass spectrometry (DIMS) metabolomics workflow

Overview of attention for article published in Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
124 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
176 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Characterising and correcting batch variation in an automated direct infusion mass spectrometry (DIMS) metabolomics workflow
Published in
Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, March 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00216-013-6856-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. A. Kirwan, D. I. Broadhurst, R. L. Davidson, M. R. Viant

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 176 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 2%
Germany 1 <1%
Vietnam 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 168 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 51 29%
Researcher 36 20%
Student > Master 21 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 7%
Student > Bachelor 10 6%
Other 16 9%
Unknown 29 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 35 20%
Chemistry 34 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 29 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 3%
Other 26 15%
Unknown 35 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2022.
All research outputs
#5,266,281
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#790
of 9,764 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,482
of 207,419 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#14
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,764 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,419 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.