You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Acceptability of Aedes aegypti blood feeding on dengue virus-infected human volunteers for vector competence studies in Iquitos, Peru
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, February 2019
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007090 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Amy C. Morrison, Julia Schwarz, Kanya C. Long, Jhonny Cordova, Jennifer E. Rios, W. Lorena Quiroz, S. Alfonso Vizcarra, Robert D. Hontz, Thomas W. Scott, Louis Lambrechts, Valerie A. Paz Soldan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 1 | 14% |
United States | 1 | 14% |
France | 1 | 14% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 71% |
Scientists | 2 | 29% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 49 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 11 | 22% |
Researcher | 8 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 6% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 4% |
Other | 6 | 12% |
Unknown | 15 | 31% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 18% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 10% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 3 | 6% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 6% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 6% |
Other | 9 | 18% |
Unknown | 17 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2019.
All research outputs
#7,393,490
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
#4,331
of 9,460 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#149,166
of 458,537 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
#100
of 192 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,460 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 458,537 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 192 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.