You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Distinguishing scientific knowledge: The impact of different measures of knowledge on genetically modified food attitudes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Public Understanding of Science, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1177/0963662518824837 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kathleen M. Rose, Emily L. Howell, Leona Y.-F. Su, Michael A. Xenos, Dominique Brossard, Dietram A. Scheufele |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 64 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 10 | 16% |
| Researcher | 9 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 12 | 19% |
| Unknown | 16 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 8 | 13% |
| Psychology | 6 | 9% |
| Arts and Humanities | 5 | 8% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 5 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 17 | 27% |
| Unknown | 20 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2022.
All research outputs
#4,178,638
of 23,508,125 outputs
Outputs from Public Understanding of Science
#430
of 1,050 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,047
of 450,478 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Public Understanding of Science
#7
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,508,125 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,050 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,478 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.