↓ Skip to main content

What's in an author's name? Differential evaluations of performance as a function of author's name

Overview of attention for article published in Sex Roles, February 1985
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
85 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
What's in an author's name? Differential evaluations of performance as a function of author's name
Published in
Sex Roles, February 1985
DOI 10.1007/bf00287601
Authors

Michele A. Paludi, Lisa A. Strayer

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Czechia 1 4%
Unknown 23 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 21%
Researcher 4 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 13%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 3 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 10 42%
Psychology 5 21%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 3 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2010.
All research outputs
#7,412,246
of 22,661,413 outputs
Outputs from Sex Roles
#1,091
of 2,257 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,129
of 38,290 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sex Roles
#5
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,661,413 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,257 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.5. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 38,290 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.