| Title |
Adenosine-stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in suspected coronary artery disease: a net cost analysis and reimbursement implications
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, June 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10554-010-9645-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Guenter Pilz, Pankaj A. Patel, Ulrich Fell, Joseph A. Ladapo, John A. Rizzo, Hai Fang, Candace Gunnarsson, Tobias Heer, Berthold Hoefling |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 41 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 17% |
| Researcher | 5 | 12% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 8 | 20% |
| Unknown | 10 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 32% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 12% |
| Unknown | 15 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2016.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging
#351
of 2,012 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,261
of 105,068 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,012 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 105,068 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.