↓ Skip to main content

Size-biased sampling of Poisson point processes and excursions

Overview of attention for article published in Probability Theory and Related Fields, March 1992
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#43 of 272)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
282 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Size-biased sampling of Poisson point processes and excursions
Published in
Probability Theory and Related Fields, March 1992
DOI 10.1007/bf01205234
Authors

Mihael Perman, Jim Pitman, Marc Yor

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
France 1 2%
Unknown 51 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 28%
Researcher 8 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 13%
Professor 5 9%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 5 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Mathematics 25 47%
Computer Science 13 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Engineering 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 4 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2019.
All research outputs
#7,855,444
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Probability Theory and Related Fields
#43
of 272 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,614
of 19,202 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Probability Theory and Related Fields
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 272 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 19,202 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them