↓ Skip to main content

The lethal paraphiliac syndrome: accidental autoerotic deaths in four women and a review of the literature

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Legal Medicine, June 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
The lethal paraphiliac syndrome: accidental autoerotic deaths in four women and a review of the literature
Published in
International Journal of Legal Medicine, June 2002
DOI 10.1007/s00414-001-0271-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

N. Behrendt, N. Buhl, S. Seidl

Abstract

Four previously unpublished cases of female asphyxiophilia are presented. All women were found immobilised by obviously self-tied ropes, string or handcuffs. The women, who were alone at the time of death, died of a lethal paraphilia. The autopsies revealed asphyxiation as the cause of death, caused in two cases by suffocation as a result of hanging and strangulation and in the other two cases by plastic bags placed over the individuals head. In one case there was additional evidence at the scene that the deceased had inhaled ether. In none of the four cases was there any indication that the asphyxiation was due to homicide or suicide. Thus they can be described as accidental autoerotic deaths (AAD). The four cases closely mirror findings from scenes of male AADs, although autoerotic practices are generally believed to be rarer among females than in males.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 3%
Argentina 1 3%
Unknown 37 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 21%
Researcher 5 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 13%
Lecturer 4 10%
Student > Postgraduate 3 8%
Other 7 18%
Unknown 7 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 36%
Psychology 6 15%
Social Sciences 4 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 9 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2023.
All research outputs
#1,526,183
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Legal Medicine
#51
of 2,315 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,537
of 127,793 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Legal Medicine
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,315 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 127,793 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.