↓ Skip to main content

Quantification of frequency-dependent genetic architectures in 25 UK Biobank traits reveals action of negative selection

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
121 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
115 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Quantification of frequency-dependent genetic architectures in 25 UK Biobank traits reveals action of negative selection
Published in
Nature Communications, February 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41467-019-08424-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Armin P. Schoech, Daniel M. Jordan, Po-Ru Loh, Steven Gazal, Luke J. O’Connor, Daniel J. Balick, Pier F. Palamara, Hilary K. Finucane, Shamil R. Sunyaev, Alkes L. Price

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 115 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 25%
Researcher 21 18%
Student > Master 9 8%
Student > Bachelor 7 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 4%
Other 13 11%
Unknown 31 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 32 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 18%
Mathematics 6 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 5%
Computer Science 3 3%
Other 11 10%
Unknown 36 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2024.
All research outputs
#3,360,563
of 25,918,104 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#33,742
of 58,099 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,959
of 480,664 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#880
of 1,389 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,918,104 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 58,099 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.6. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 480,664 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,389 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.