↓ Skip to main content

Concise Commentary: Treatment of Recurrent C. difficile Infection: A New Take on the Fecal–Oral Route

Overview of attention for article published in Digestive Diseases and Sciences, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Concise Commentary: Treatment of Recurrent C. difficile Infection: A New Take on the Fecal–Oral Route
Published in
Digestive Diseases and Sciences, February 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10620-019-05498-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Caterina Oneto, Paul Feuerstadt

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 1 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 20%
Unknown 3 60%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 1 20%
Engineering 1 20%
Unknown 3 60%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2019.
All research outputs
#18,699,725
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Digestive Diseases and Sciences
#3,249
of 4,304 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#318,546
of 453,637 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Digestive Diseases and Sciences
#57
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,304 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 453,637 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.