You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Pilot trial of a STOMA psychosocial intervention programme for colorectal cancer patients with stomas
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Advanced Nursing, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1111/jan.13973 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Siew Hoon Lim, Sally Wai Chi Chan, Aloysius Chow, Lixia Zhu, Jiunn Herng Lai, Hong‐Gu He |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 40% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 150 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 7% |
| Researcher | 9 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 25 | 17% |
| Unknown | 61 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 32 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 11% |
| Psychology | 16 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 7% |
| Unknown | 68 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2019.
All research outputs
#7,989,503
of 24,041,016 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Advanced Nursing
#2,876
of 5,398 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#144,167
of 355,427 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Advanced Nursing
#61
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,041,016 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,398 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,427 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.