↓ Skip to main content

Correlation of pain, functional impairment, and health-related quality of life with radiological grading scales of lumbar degenerative disc disease

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Neurochirurgica, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
Title
Correlation of pain, functional impairment, and health-related quality of life with radiological grading scales of lumbar degenerative disc disease
Published in
Acta Neurochirurgica, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00701-015-2700-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

M.-V. Corniola, M. N. Stienen, H. Joswig, N. R. Smoll, K. Schaller, G. Hildebrandt, O. P. Gautschi

Abstract

It is generally believed that radiological signs of lumbar degenerative disc disease (DDD) are associated with increased pain and functional impairment as well as lower health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Our aim was to assess the association of the Modic and Pfirrmann grading scales with established outcome questionnaires and the timed-up-and-go (TUG) test. In a prospective two-center study with patients scheduled for lumbar spine surgery, visual analogue scale (VAS) for back and leg pain, Roland-Morris Disability Index, Oswestry Disability Index and HRQoL, as determined by the Short-Form (SF)-12 and the Euro-Qol, were recorded. Functional mobility was measured with the TUG test. Modic type (MOD) and Pfirrmann grade (PFI) of the affected lumbar segment were assessed with preoperative imaging. Uni- and multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to estimate the effect size of the relationship between clinical and radiological findings. Two hundred eighty-four patients (mean age 58.5, 119 (42 %) females) were enrolled. None of the radiological grading scales were significantly associated with any of the subjective or objective clinical tests. There was a tendency for higher VAS back pain (3.48 vs. 4.14, p = 0.096) and lower SF-12 physical component scale (31.2 vs. 29.4, p = 0.065) in patients with high PFI (4-5) as compared to patients with low PFI (0-3). In the multivariate analysis, patients with MOD changes of the vertebral endplates were 100 % as likely as patients without changes to show an impaired TUG test performance (odds ratio (OR) 1.00, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.56-1.80, p = 0.982). Patients with high PFI were 145 % as likely as those with low PFI to show an impaired TUG test performance (OR 1.45, 95 % CI 0.79-2.66, p = 0.230). There was no association between established outcome questionnaires of symptom severity and two widely used radiological classifications in patients undergoing surgery for lumbar DDD.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 70 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 11%
Student > Master 8 11%
Other 6 9%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Professor 4 6%
Other 18 26%
Unknown 20 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 44%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 6%
Psychology 3 4%
Neuroscience 3 4%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 19 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2022.
All research outputs
#6,613,481
of 23,791,297 outputs
Outputs from Acta Neurochirurgica
#460
of 1,995 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,432
of 398,447 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Neurochirurgica
#7
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,791,297 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,995 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,447 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.