| Title |
Biological sequences as pictures – a generic two dimensional solution for iterated maps
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Bioinformatics, March 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2105-10-100 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jonas S Almeida, Susana Vinga |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 7% |
| Denmark | 1 | 2% |
| Portugal | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Poland | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 38 | 84% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 33% |
| Researcher | 12 | 27% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 4% |
| Librarian | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 11% |
| Unknown | 6 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 36% |
| Computer Science | 7 | 16% |
| Mathematics | 4 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 7% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 16% |
| Unknown | 6 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2023.
All research outputs
#5,298,676
of 24,896,578 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#1,922
of 7,603 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,110
of 103,054 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#7
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,896,578 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,603 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,054 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.