| Title |
Quality of reports of investigations of research integrity by academic institutions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Research Integrity and Peer Review, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s41073-019-0062-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andrew Grey, Mark Bolland, Greg Gamble, Alison Avenell |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 97 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 18 | 19% |
| Japan | 17 | 18% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| Ireland | 1 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Guinea | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 55 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 74 | 76% |
| Scientists | 17 | 18% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 30 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 13% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Professor | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 10 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 4 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 10% |
| Philosophy | 2 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 7% |
| Psychology | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 5 | 17% |
| Unknown | 12 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 75. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2022.
All research outputs
#580,170
of 25,724,500 outputs
Outputs from Research Integrity and Peer Review
#23
of 133 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,316
of 367,871 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research Integrity and Peer Review
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,724,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 133 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 77.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,871 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.