↓ Skip to main content

Complications of Anterior Subcutaneous Internal Fixation for Unstable Pelvis Fractures: A Multicenter Study

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
5 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
138 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
Title
Complications of Anterior Subcutaneous Internal Fixation for Unstable Pelvis Fractures: A Multicenter Study
Published in
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, August 2012
DOI 10.1007/s11999-011-2233-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rahul Vaidya, Erik N. Kubiak, Patrick F. Bergin, Derek G. Dombroski, Ren J. Critchlow, Anil Sethi, Adam J. Starr

Abstract

Stabilization after a pelvic fracture can be accomplished with an anterior external fixator. These devices are uncomfortable for patients and are at risk for infection and loosening, especially in obese patients. As an alternative, we recently developed an anterior subcutaneous pelvic internal fixation technique (ASPIF).

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 101 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 11 11%
Researcher 10 10%
Student > Master 9 9%
Student > Postgraduate 8 8%
Professor 7 7%
Other 26 25%
Unknown 31 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 51 50%
Engineering 4 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 <1%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 <1%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 38 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2022.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#2,440
of 7,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,213
of 179,163 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#31
of 125 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,298 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,163 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 125 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.