↓ Skip to main content

Current Updates on Classification, Diagnosis and Treatment of Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis (HLH)

Overview of attention for article published in Indian Journal of Pediatrics, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
69 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
94 Mendeley
Title
Current Updates on Classification, Diagnosis and Treatment of Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis (HLH)
Published in
Indian Journal of Pediatrics, February 2016
DOI 10.1007/s12098-016-2037-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Manisha Madkaikar, Snehal Shabrish, Mukesh Desai

Abstract

Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is a life threatening hyperinflammatory syndrome characterized by excessive activation of macrophages and T cells resulting from defective cytotoxicity. Severe hyperinflammation caused by uncontrolled proliferation of activated lymphocytes and histiocytes (macrophages) secreting high amounts of inflammatory cytokines threatens the life of the patient and may lead to death unless arrested by appropriate treatment. HLH can be caused either by certain underlying genetic diseases (familial HLH), or may also occur due to particular triggers in patients with no known inherited disorder (acquired HLH). Due to life threatening nature of the disease, early diagnosis and initiation of immunosuppressive therapy is extremely important. HLH diagnosis is based on constellation of clinical manifestations and laboratory parameters which often overlap with those of severe infection or sepsis. Identification of patients with familial HLH and their underlying genetic defects requires specialized laboratory tests and is important for predicting relapses and planning early therapeutic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). A high suspicion and thorough clinical, immunological and genetic work-up is required for diagnosis of HLH. Prompt initiation of adequate treatment is essential for the survival. Substantial progress has been made in exploring the complex cause and pathophysiology of HLH and also in management of HLH patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Uruguay 1 1%
Unknown 93 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 15%
Student > Postgraduate 12 13%
Researcher 11 12%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Other 8 9%
Other 22 23%
Unknown 19 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 59 63%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 1%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 20 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2016.
All research outputs
#18,439,846
of 22,846,662 outputs
Outputs from Indian Journal of Pediatrics
#1,105
of 1,531 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#290,774
of 400,824 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Indian Journal of Pediatrics
#19
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,846,662 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,531 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,824 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.