↓ Skip to main content

Recent advances in actinorhizal symbiosis signaling

Overview of attention for article published in Plant Molecular Biology, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
Title
Recent advances in actinorhizal symbiosis signaling
Published in
Plant Molecular Biology, February 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11103-016-0450-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emilie Froussart, Jocelyne Bonneau, Claudine Franche, Didier Bogusz

Abstract

Nitrogen and phosphorus availability are frequent limiting factors in plant growth and development. Certain bacteria and fungi form root endosymbiotic relationships with plants enabling them to exploit atmospheric nitrogen and soil phosphorus. The relationships between bacteria and plants include nitrogen-fixing Gram-negative proteobacteria called rhizobia that are able to interact with most leguminous plants (Fabaceae) but also with the non-legume Parasponia (Cannabaceae), and actinobacteria Frankia, which are able to interact with about 260 species collectively called actinorhizal plants. Fungi involved in the relationship with plants include Glomeromycota that form an arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) association intracellularly within the roots of more than 80 % of land plants. Increasing numbers of reports suggest that the rhizobial association with legumes has recycled part of the ancestral program used by most plants to interact with AM fungi. This review focuses on the most recent progress made in plant genetic control of root nodulation that occurs in non-legume actinorhizal plant species.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 83 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 27%
Researcher 14 17%
Student > Bachelor 10 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 10%
Student > Master 8 10%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 14 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 47 57%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 18%
Environmental Science 4 5%
Chemical Engineering 1 1%
Mathematics 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 12 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2016.
All research outputs
#4,122,492
of 24,885,505 outputs
Outputs from Plant Molecular Biology
#345
of 2,891 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,500
of 411,633 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Molecular Biology
#5
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,885,505 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,891 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 411,633 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.