↓ Skip to main content

An exploratory clinical evaluation of a head-worn display based multiple-patient monitoring application: impact on supervising anesthesiologists’ situation awareness

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
Title
An exploratory clinical evaluation of a head-worn display based multiple-patient monitoring application: impact on supervising anesthesiologists’ situation awareness
Published in
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, February 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10877-019-00265-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul D. Schlosser, Tobias Grundgeiger, Penelope M. Sanderson, Oliver Happel

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 18%
Researcher 7 18%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Student > Master 2 5%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 13 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 20%
Engineering 6 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 10%
Computer Science 3 8%
Social Sciences 3 8%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 11 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2019.
All research outputs
#13,639,049
of 23,130,383 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing
#356
of 706 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#216,509
of 437,522 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing
#5
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,130,383 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 706 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,522 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.