| Title |
Observer variability in the pulmonary examination
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, January 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02596418 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Cynthia D. Mulrow, Bart L. Dolmatch, Elizabeth R. Delong, John R. Feussner, Mark C. Benyunes, Joel L. Dietz, Stephen K. Lucas, Etta D. Pisano, Laura P. Svetkey, Brian D. Volpp, Russell E. Ware, Francis A. Neelon |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 11% |
| Germany | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 7 | 78% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 3 | 33% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 22% |
| Researcher | 2 | 22% |
| Librarian | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 1 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 44% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 22% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 11% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 11% |
| Engineering | 1 | 11% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 1997.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#4,473
of 8,256 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#165,616
of 457,479 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#83
of 146 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,256 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.2. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 457,479 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 146 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.