| Title |
Dissimilar effects of human and elephant disturbance on woodland structure and functional bird diversity in the mopane woodlands of Zambia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Landscape Ecology, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10980-019-00774-2 |
| Authors |
Hemant G. Tripathi, Tiwonge I. Mzumara, Rowan O. Martin, Catherine L. Parr, Chaona Phiri, Casey M. Ryan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 22% |
| South Africa | 3 | 13% |
| India | 1 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
| Finland | 1 | 4% |
| Zambia | 1 | 4% |
| Brazil | 1 | 4% |
| Malawi | 1 | 4% |
| New Caledonia | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 8 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 74% |
| Scientists | 5 | 22% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 60 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 11 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 24 | 40% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 28% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 13 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2019.
All research outputs
#2,733,304
of 25,660,026 outputs
Outputs from Landscape Ecology
#238
of 1,732 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,593
of 367,676 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Landscape Ecology
#7
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,660,026 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,732 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,676 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.