| Title |
GDPR: an impediment to research?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Irish Journal of Medical Science, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11845-019-01980-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Niamh Clarke, Gillian Vale, Emer P. Reeves, Mary Kirwan, David Smith, Michael Farrell, Gerard Hurl, Noel G. McElvaney |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 147 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 80 | 54% |
| United Kingdom | 8 | 5% |
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| Canada | 2 | 1% |
| Guyana | 1 | <1% |
| Nepal | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 48 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 88 | 60% |
| Scientists | 39 | 27% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 18 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 118 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 21 | 18% |
| Researcher | 12 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 15 | 13% |
| Unknown | 47 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 6 | 5% |
| Engineering | 6 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 26 | 22% |
| Unknown | 50 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 102. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2020.
All research outputs
#420,659
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Irish Journal of Medical Science
#11
of 1,560 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,711
of 453,928 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Irish Journal of Medical Science
#1
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,560 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 453,928 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.