You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
TERT promoter mutations are highly recurrent in SHH subgroup medulloblastoma
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Acta Neuropathologica, October 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00401-013-1198-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marc Remke, Vijay Ramaswamy, John Peacock, David J. H. Shih, Christian Koelsche, Paul A. Northcott, Nadia Hill, Florence M. G. Cavalli, Marcel Kool, Xin Wang, Stephen C. Mack, Mark Barszczyk, A. Sorana Morrissy, Xiaochong Wu, Sameer Agnihotri, Betty Luu, David T. W. Jones, Livia Garzia, Adrian M. Dubuc, Nataliya Zhukova, Robert Vanner, Johan M. Kros, Pim J. French, Erwin G. Van Meir, Rajeev Vibhakar, Karel Zitterbart, Jennifer A. Chan, László Bognár, Almos Klekner, Boleslaw Lach, Shin Jung, Ali G. Saad, Linda M. Liau, Steffen Albrecht, Massimo Zollo, Michael K. Cooper, Reid C. Thompson, Oliver O. Delattre, Franck Bourdeaut, François F. Doz, Miklós Garami, Peter Hauser, Carlos G. Carlotti, Timothy E. Van Meter, Luca Massimi, Daniel Fults, Scott L. Pomeroy, Toshiro Kumabe, Young Shin Ra, Jeffrey R. Leonard, Samer K. Elbabaa, Jaume Mora, Joshua B. Rubin, Yoon-Jae Cho, Roger E. McLendon, Darell D. Bigner, Charles G. Eberhart, Maryam Fouladi, Robert J. Wechsler-Reya, Claudia C. Faria, Sidney E. Croul, Annie Huang, Eric Bouffet, Cynthia E. Hawkins, Peter B. Dirks, William A. Weiss, Ulrich Schüller, Ian F. Pollack, Stefan Rutkowski, David Meyronet, Anne Jouvet, Michelle Fèvre-Montange, Nada Jabado, Marta Perek-Polnik, Wieslawa A. Grajkowska, Seung-Ki Kim, James T. Rutka, David Malkin, Uri Tabori, Stefan M. Pfister, Andrey Korshunov, Andreas von Deimling, Michael D. Taylor |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 165 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 160 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 20% |
| Researcher | 26 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 7% |
| Other | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 32 | 19% |
| Unknown | 34 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 41 | 25% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 38 | 23% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 23 | 14% |
| Neuroscience | 7 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 9 | 5% |
| Unknown | 45 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2020.
All research outputs
#3,282,218
of 22,846,662 outputs
Outputs from Acta Neuropathologica
#852
of 2,372 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,786
of 213,193 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Neuropathologica
#14
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,846,662 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,372 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,193 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.