↓ Skip to main content

Accounting for environmental change in continuous-time stochastic population models

Overview of attention for article published in Theoretical Ecology, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
Accounting for environmental change in continuous-time stochastic population models
Published in
Theoretical Ecology, July 2018
DOI 10.1007/s12080-018-0386-z
Authors

Geoffrey Legault, Brett A. Melbourne

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 54%
Student > Bachelor 1 8%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 8%
Researcher 1 8%
Student > Postgraduate 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 2 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 8%
Mathematics 1 8%
Environmental Science 1 8%
Computer Science 1 8%
Other 3 23%
Unknown 4 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2022.
All research outputs
#6,658,340
of 23,530,272 outputs
Outputs from Theoretical Ecology
#72
of 221 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,191
of 328,552 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Theoretical Ecology
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,530,272 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 221 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,552 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them