| Title |
When There Is Too Much to Do
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, April 2004
|
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.30357.x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eric G Poon, Jennifer S Haas, Ann Louise Puopolo, Tejal K Gandhi, Elisabeth Burdick, David W Bates, Troyen A Brennan |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 55 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 18% |
| Researcher | 9 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 11% |
| Other | 11 | 20% |
| Unknown | 3 | 5% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 38% |
| Computer Science | 6 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 7% |
| Psychology | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 7 | 13% |
| Unknown | 8 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2015.
All research outputs
#5,446,210
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#3,260
of 8,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,289
of 65,049 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#23
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,173 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 65,049 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.