↓ Skip to main content

Laparoscopic Dor versus Toupet fundoplication following Heller myotomy for achalasia: results of a multicenter, prospective, randomized-controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Surgical Endoscopy, July 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
268 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
119 Mendeley
Title
Laparoscopic Dor versus Toupet fundoplication following Heller myotomy for achalasia: results of a multicenter, prospective, randomized-controlled trial
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy, July 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00464-011-1822-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Arthur Rawlings, Nathaniel J. Soper, Brant Oelschlager, Lee Swanstrom, Brent D. Matthews, Carlos Pellegrini, Richard A. Pierce, Aurora Pryor, Valeria Martin, Margaret M. Frisella, Maria Cassera, L. Michael Brunt

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
Chile 1 <1%
Unknown 115 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 21%
Other 15 13%
Student > Postgraduate 12 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Other 28 24%
Unknown 22 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 74 62%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Psychology 3 3%
Chemistry 2 2%
Other 5 4%
Unknown 28 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2022.
All research outputs
#7,398,298
of 22,792,160 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#1,657
of 6,032 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,095
of 119,661 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#4
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,792,160 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,032 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 119,661 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.