↓ Skip to main content

Granularity matters: comparing different ways of measuring self-regulated learning

Overview of attention for article published in Metacognition and Learning, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
105 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
274 Mendeley
Title
Granularity matters: comparing different ways of measuring self-regulated learning
Published in
Metacognition and Learning, February 2019
DOI 10.1007/s11409-019-09188-6
Authors

Sanne F. E. Rovers, Geraldine Clarebout, Hans H. C. M. Savelberg, Anique B. H. de Bruin, Jeroen J. G. van Merriënboer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 274 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 274 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 18%
Student > Master 26 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 23 8%
Researcher 22 8%
Lecturer 22 8%
Other 47 17%
Unknown 86 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 48 18%
Psychology 38 14%
Computer Science 18 7%
Arts and Humanities 16 6%
Mathematics 10 4%
Other 43 16%
Unknown 101 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2020.
All research outputs
#15,682,052
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Metacognition and Learning
#148
of 230 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#264,294
of 453,176 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Metacognition and Learning
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 230 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 453,176 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.