| Title |
Simulations of anthropogenic change in the strength of the Brewer–Dobson circulation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Climate Dynamics, August 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00382-006-0162-4 |
| Authors |
N. Butchart, A. A. Scaife, M. Bourqui, J. de Grandpré, S. H. E. Hare, J. Kettleborough, U. Langematz, E. Manzini, F. Sassi, K. Shibata, D. Shindell, M. Sigmond |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Slovenia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 126 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 42 | 30% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 25 | 18% |
| Unknown | 13 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 77 | 56% |
| Environmental Science | 20 | 14% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 11 | 8% |
| Chemistry | 4 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 7% |
| Unknown | 14 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2013.
All research outputs
#4,709,809
of 22,846,662 outputs
Outputs from Climate Dynamics
#1,588
of 4,919 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,897
of 54,516 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climate Dynamics
#7
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,846,662 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,919 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 54,516 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.