Title |
The Effect of Branched Chain Amino Acids-Enriched Nutritional Supplements on Activities of Daily Living and Muscle Mass in Inpatients with Gait Impairments: A Randomized Controlled Trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
The journal of nutrition, health & aging, April 2019
|
DOI | 10.1007/s12603-019-1172-3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Misa Moriwaki, H. Wakabayashi, K. Sakata, K. Domen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 4 | 15% |
United States | 3 | 11% |
France | 2 | 7% |
Australia | 2 | 7% |
Canada | 1 | 4% |
Brazil | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 14 | 52% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 15 | 56% |
Scientists | 8 | 30% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 11% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 106 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 11 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 11 | 10% |
Researcher | 9 | 8% |
Other | 8 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 6% |
Other | 18 | 17% |
Unknown | 43 | 41% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 14% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 10% |
Sports and Recreations | 7 | 7% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 4% |
Other | 12 | 11% |
Unknown | 52 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2021.
All research outputs
#2,229,706
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from The journal of nutrition, health & aging
#268
of 2,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,683
of 365,494 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The journal of nutrition, health & aging
#11
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,003 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,494 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.