↓ Skip to main content

Outpatient Prescribing Errors and the Impact of Computerized Prescribing

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of General Internal Medicine, August 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
200 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
201 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Outpatient Prescribing Errors and the Impact of Computerized Prescribing
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine, August 2005
DOI 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.0194.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tejal K. Gandhi, Saul N. Weingart, Andrew C. Seger, Joshua Borus, Elisabeth Burdick, Eric G. Poon, Lucian L. Leape, David W. Bates

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 201 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 9 4%
Germany 3 1%
India 2 <1%
Argentina 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Uruguay 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 180 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 15%
Researcher 27 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 8%
Student > Bachelor 15 7%
Other 48 24%
Unknown 41 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 82 41%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 23 11%
Computer Science 17 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Other 17 8%
Unknown 46 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2023.
All research outputs
#5,239,707
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#3,144
of 8,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,338
of 68,214 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#17
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,173 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 68,214 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.