↓ Skip to main content

The ACL-deficient knee and the prevalence of meniscus and cartilage lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis (CRD42017076897)

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
88 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
117 Mendeley
Title
The ACL-deficient knee and the prevalence of meniscus and cartilage lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis (CRD42017076897)
Published in
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, February 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00402-019-03128-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julian Mehl, Alexander Otto, Joshua B. Baldino, Andrea Achtnich, Ralph Akoto, Andreas B. Imhoff, Sven Scheffler, Wolf Petersen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 117 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 9%
Student > Master 10 9%
Researcher 9 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Other 7 6%
Other 22 19%
Unknown 51 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 6%
Sports and Recreations 6 5%
Engineering 4 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 59 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2020.
All research outputs
#6,431,138
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery
#234
of 1,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#135,598
of 451,595 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery
#2
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,215 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,595 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.