You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Consortium of Metabolomics Studies (COMETS): Metabolomics in 47 Prospective Cohort Studies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
American Journal of Epidemiology, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1093/aje/kwz028 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bing Yu, Krista A Zanetti, Marinella Temprosa, Demetrius Albanes, Nathan Appel, Clara Barrios Barrera, Yoav Ben-Shlomo, Eric Boerwinkle, Juan P Casas, Clary Clish, Caroline Dale, Abbas Dehghan, Andriy Derkach, A Heather Eliassen, Paul Elliott, Eoin Fahy, Christian Gieger, Marc J Gunter, Sei Harada, Tamara Harris, Deron R Herr, David Herrington, Joel N Hirschhorn, Elise Hoover, Ann W Hsing, Mattias Johansson, Rachel S Kelly, Chin Meng Khoo, Mika Kivimäki, Bruce S Kristal, Claudia Langenberg, Jessica Lasky-Su, Deborah A Lawlor, Luca A Lotta, Massimo Mangino, Loïc Le Marchand, Ewy Mathé, Charles E Matthews, Cristina Menni, Lorelei A Mucci, Rachel Murphy, Matej Oresic, Eric Orwoll, Jennifer Ose, Alexandre C Pereira, Mary C Playdon, Lucilla Poston, Jackie Price, Qibin Qi, Kathryn Rexrode, Adam Risch, Joshua Sampson, Wei Jie Seow, Howard D Sesso, Svati H Shah, Xiao-Ou Shu, Gordon C S Smith, Ulla Sovio, Victoria L Stevens, Rachael Stolzenberg-Solomon, Toru Takebayashi, Therese Tillin, Ruth Travis, Ioanna Tzoulaki, Cornelia M Ulrich, Ramachandran S Vasan, Mukesh Verma, Ying Wang, Nick J Wareham, Andrew Wong, Naji Younes, Hua Zhao, Wei Zheng, Steven C Moore |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 40% |
| Australia | 2 | 10% |
| Sweden | 1 | 5% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| Guinea | 1 | 5% |
| Finland | 1 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Comoros | 1 | 5% |
| Norway | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 3 | 15% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 50% |
| Scientists | 6 | 30% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 153 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 31 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 24 | 16% |
| Unknown | 49 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 21% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 19 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 31 | 20% |
| Unknown | 53 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2022.
All research outputs
#1,513,380
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Epidemiology
#1,007
of 9,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,551
of 370,553 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Epidemiology
#20
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,146 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,553 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.