| Title |
Guidelines on nicotine dose selection for in vivo research
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Psychopharmacology, August 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00213-006-0441-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shannon G. Matta, David J. Balfour, Neal L. Benowitz, R. Thomas Boyd, Jerry J. Buccafusco, Anthony R. Caggiula, Caroline R. Craig, Allan C. Collins, M. Imad Damaj, Eric C. Donny, Phillip S. Gardiner, Sharon R. Grady, Ulrike Heberlein, Sherry S. Leonard, Edward D. Levin, Ronald J. Lukas, Athina Markou, Michael J. Marks, Sarah E. McCallum, Neeraja Parameswaran, Kenneth A. Perkins, Marina R. Picciotto, Maryka Quik, Jed E. Rose, Adrian Rothenfluh, William R. Schafer, Ian P. Stolerman, Rachel F. Tyndale, Jeanne M. Wehner, Jeffrey M. Zirger |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Canada | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 478 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 19 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 1% |
| France | 3 | <1% |
| India | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 446 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 112 | 23% |
| Researcher | 79 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 48 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 48 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 28 | 6% |
| Other | 98 | 21% |
| Unknown | 65 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 128 | 27% |
| Neuroscience | 72 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 55 | 12% |
| Psychology | 42 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 31 | 6% |
| Other | 58 | 12% |
| Unknown | 92 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2020.
All research outputs
#3,071,796
of 22,849,304 outputs
Outputs from Psychopharmacology
#779
of 5,350 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,778
of 65,853 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychopharmacology
#6
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,849,304 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,350 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 65,853 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.