| Title |
Back to the edge: relative coordinate system for use-wear analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12520-019-00801-y |
| Authors |
Ivan Calandra, Lisa Schunk, Alice Rodriguez, Walter Gneisinger, Antonella Pedergnana, Eduardo Paixao, Telmo Pereira, Radu Iovita, Joao Marreiros |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
| Germany | 1 | 13% |
| Australia | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 75% |
| Scientists | 2 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 29 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 24% |
| Researcher | 6 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 8 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Arts and Humanities | 12 | 41% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 9 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2020.
All research outputs
#6,699,285
of 24,615,420 outputs
Outputs from Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences
#385
of 904 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,901
of 358,164 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences
#18
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,615,420 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 904 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,164 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.