↓ Skip to main content

Pericytes Favor Oligodendrocyte Fate Choice in Adult Neural Stem Cells

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pericytes Favor Oligodendrocyte Fate Choice in Adult Neural Stem Cells
Published in
Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, March 2019
DOI 10.3389/fncel.2019.00085
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria Elena Silva, Simona Lange, Bryan Hinrichsen, Amber R. Philp, Carolina R. Reyes, Diego Halabi, Josselyne B. Mansilla, Peter Rotheneichner, Alerie Guzman de la Fuente, Sebastien Couillard-Despres, Luis F. Bátiz, Robin J. M. Franklin, Ludwig Aigner, Francisco J. Rivera

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 49 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 16%
Researcher 8 16%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 12%
Student > Postgraduate 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Other 10 20%
Unknown 10 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 13 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 13 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2019.
All research outputs
#14,856,757
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
#1,876
of 4,753 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#182,474
of 367,829 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
#73
of 146 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,753 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,829 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 146 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.