↓ Skip to main content

Structural differences in the diaphragm of patients following controlled vs assisted and spontaneous mechanical ventilation

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
17 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
93 Mendeley
Title
Structural differences in the diaphragm of patients following controlled vs assisted and spontaneous mechanical ventilation
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine, February 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00134-019-05566-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. Marin-Corral, I. Dot, M. Boguña, L. Cecchini, A. Zapatero, M. P. Gracia, S. Pascual-Guardia, C. Vilà, A. Castellví, P. Pérez-Terán, J. Gea, J. R. Masclans

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 93 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 9%
Student > Master 8 9%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Professor 7 8%
Other 28 30%
Unknown 15 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 45%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 4%
Neuroscience 3 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 26 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2019.
All research outputs
#3,305,645
of 25,382,250 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#2,108
of 5,397 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,245
of 360,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#55
of 108 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,250 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,397 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,146 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 108 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.