You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Qualitative study to identify ethnicity-specific perceptions of and barriers to asthma management in South Asian and White British children with asthma
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMJ Open, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024545 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Monica Lakhanpaul, Lorraine Culley, Tausif Huq, Deborah Bird, Nicky Hudson, Noelle Robertson, Melanie McFeeters, Logan Manikam, Narynder Johal, Charlotte Hamlyn-Williams, Mark R D Johnson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 82 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 11 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 13% |
| Researcher | 10 | 12% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 13% |
| Unknown | 30 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 6% |
| Sports and Recreations | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 17% |
| Unknown | 33 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2020.
All research outputs
#15,745,807
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open
#16,962
of 25,597 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#205,098
of 366,765 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open
#567
of 771 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,597 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,765 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 771 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.