↓ Skip to main content

The distorting effects of racial animus on proximity voting in the 2016 elections

Overview of attention for article published in Electoral Studies, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
39 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The distorting effects of racial animus on proximity voting in the 2016 elections
Published in
Electoral Studies, April 2019
DOI 10.1016/j.electstud.2019.02.001
Authors

Carlos Algara, Isaac Hale

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 30%
Lecturer 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Other 2 5%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 13 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 19 51%
Psychology 2 5%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Neuroscience 1 3%
Engineering 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 13 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 64. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2021.
All research outputs
#667,047
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Electoral Studies
#70
of 1,406 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,362
of 364,342 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Electoral Studies
#3
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,406 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,342 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.