↓ Skip to main content

Risk and predictors of dementia and parkinsonism in idiopathic REM sleep behaviour disorder: a multicentre study

Overview of attention for article published in Brain, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
647 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
630 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Risk and predictors of dementia and parkinsonism in idiopathic REM sleep behaviour disorder: a multicentre study
Published in
Brain, February 2019
DOI 10.1093/brain/awz030
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ronald B Postuma, Alex Iranzo, Michele Hu, Birgit Högl, Bradley F Boeve, Raffaele Manni, Wolfgang H Oertel, Isabelle Arnulf, Luigi Ferini-Strambi, Monica Puligheddu, Elena Antelmi, Valerie Cochen De Cock, Dario Arnaldi, Brit Mollenhauer, Aleksandar Videnovic, Karel Sonka, Ki-Young Jung, Dieter Kunz, Yves Dauvilliers, Federica Provini, Simon J Lewis, Jitka Buskova, Milena Pavlova, Anna Heidbreder, Jacques Y Montplaisir, Joan Santamaria, Thomas R Barber, Ambra Stefani, Erik K St.Louis, Michele Terzaghi, Annette Janzen, Smandra Leu-Semenescu, Guiseppe Plazzi, Flavio Nobili, Friederike Sixel-Doering, Petr Dusek, Frederik Bes, Pietro Cortelli, Kaylena Ehgoetz Martens, Jean-Francois Gagnon, Carles Gaig, Marco Zucconi, Claudia Trenkwalder, Ziv Gan-Or, Christine Lo, Michal Rolinski, Philip Mahlknecht, Evi Holzknecht, Angel R Boeve, Luke N Teigen, Gianpaolo Toscano, Geert Mayer, Silvia Morbelli, Benjamin Dawson, Amelie Pelletier

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 73 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 630 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 630 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 76 12%
Researcher 76 12%
Student > Bachelor 60 10%
Student > Master 55 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 41 7%
Other 106 17%
Unknown 216 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 115 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 112 18%
Psychology 36 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 3%
Unspecified 17 3%
Other 73 12%
Unknown 260 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 508. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2024.
All research outputs
#50,527
of 25,443,857 outputs
Outputs from Brain
#53
of 7,639 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,051
of 367,175 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brain
#2
of 109 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,443,857 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,639 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,175 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 109 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.